Social Darwinism regard the nature as an absolute.
Comply to nature is the best. The nature give us the way of life. One do not find an absolute goal or aim in life anymore. The goal that human race must comply is the rule of nature, i.e., survival. Social Darwinists found no difficulty in finding the way of life.
However, many philosophical theroies regard Human happiness as an absolute. As a conseqence of massive practicing Social Darwinism, there will be less population in the long term, I guess, and certian suffering of the majority of the public. The economic school that closely matches to Social Darwinism political theory is Laissez-faire.
The theory hold that less govenment interference in bussines is better. But Social Darwinism holds that no government interference at all is the best.
From my own view, one cannot compare which theory is right or wrong; nor compare which theory is superior. Just comply to what one believe is fine.
A:220.127.116.11 X: TicketID:137721